The Human Element: Building a Digital-Ready Workforce
In our recent posts on digital airworthiness, we covered the strategy, the hardware (Aircraft Interface Device AID), the ground-based execution (MRO software), and the real-world implementation challenges (resources, data quality, and cultural friction).
The core takeaway from those hurdles is
this: the investment in digital maintenance technology will fail if you do not
equally, or even more heavily, invest in the people who turn data into
airworthiness. The final, most sustainable competitive advantage is not the
predictive model itself, but the digital-ready MRO workforce that trusts and
acts upon its outputs, ultimately securing the long-term ROI of investments for
digital aviation.

Photo by Ecliptic Graphic on Unsplash
1. Bridging the
Credibility Gap: The Trust Barrier for Certifiers
The single greatest
point of resistance to AHM predictive maintenance is the credibility gap
between the data scientist and the certified engineer. A maintenance
professional’s culture is based on verification, procedure, and tactile
inspection, not trusting an algorithm's output alone.
Empowering the
Part-66 Certifier
Digital tools must be
positioned to augment the engineer's skill, not replace it. The systems only
provide the what and when; the engineer provides the how
and why.
When working as a
Part-66 certifier, the highest priority was the safety sign-off, which required
absolute certainty about the aircraft's technical status and history.
Crucially, the Certificate
of Release to Service (CRS) is a declaration made by appropriately authorized
personnel once it has been verified that the task being signed for has been
properly carried out. As such, this person is responsible for the task, not any
digital system or algorithm. Furthermore, such a declaration is NOT a statement
of airworthiness of the aircraft; the ultimate obligation for airworthiness
sits with the owner/operator.
The digital tool’s
primary job is to support this legal obligation by:
- Simplifying Records: Providing instant,
immutable, and digitally signed records from the Electronic Technical Log
(ETL) and MRO suite, drastically reducing the time spent retrieving paper
history.
- Contextualizing Faults: Delivering the
predictive alert alongside the specific operational data that triggered
it, allowing the certifier to verify the alert with high-quality,
actionable context before signing off on the task.
2. Redefining the
Role: From Firefighter to Risk Manager
The widespread
adoption of Aircraft Health Monitoring (AHM) and digital tools fundamentally
changes key operational roles. Aviation maintenance training must evolve from
teaching simple software button-clicks to developing advanced analytical
skills.
The MCC’s New
Mandate
The role of the MCC
engineer and duty manager is perhaps the most transformed. When operating on
reactive maintenance, the MCC is a firefighter. With data, the MCC becomes a
strategic risk manager.
During my time in
MCC, a fault meant scrambling
to diagnose and deploy. Now, MCC training must shift to:
- Alert Interpretation: Teaching staff to distinguish a
low-confidence data anomaly from a high-confidence predictive alert and
understanding the financial and operational risk associated with deferring
the maintenance.
- Resource Orchestration: Using the MRO system's maintenance
forecasting tools to pre-position parts and technicians, transforming unscheduled maintenance events into planned, shorter turnarounds.
The Part-147 Shift
For the Part-147 Line
Maintenance Manager, the challenge is getting skilled technicians to embrace tablets, augmented reality (AR) instructions, and new diagnostic software. While
I was managing Line Maintenance at home base for a Part-147 organization, the focus was always on
hands-on practical skills. Now, training programs must integrate digital
literacy in aviation maintenance: simulation training (like virtual aircraft
trainers) and competency-based education (CBE) are key to bridging the gap
between traditional mechanical skills and modern data-driven diagnostics.
3. Forging the
OCC-MCC Partnership: Shared Situational Awareness
The Operations ControlCenter (OCC) and the Maintenance Control Center (MCC) traditionally have an
adversarial relationship: Operations demands maximized utilization; Maintenance demands time on the ground. Digital data finally allows them to collaborate
effectively.
During my time in
MCC, communication with the
OCC was frequent, intense, and often focused on negotiating the least amount of
ground time. Now, the key is shared access to the same high-fidelity data.
- OCC’s New Skill: The OCC team needs to be trained on interpreting
maintenance risk data. They don't need to be engineers, but they must
understand the probability of a dispatch delay associated with a
predictive alert, allowing them to make smarter fleet decisions (e.g.,
swapping an aircraft hours before a predicted component failure occurs).
- Predictive Dispatch: With AHM data integrated into both MRO
and flight operations systems, the OCC can now proactively adjust the
flight schedule to facilitate a planned, pre-emptive component change
during a short ground time, thereby avoiding a high-cost, high-disruption
AOG event later in the schedule. This joint situational awareness is a strategic
imperative for improving dispatch reliability.
4. Breaking Down
Silos Through Data Integrity
The human challenge is
not just technical; it is organizational. The greatest digital benefits come
from cross-functional alignment.
In my 30 years of
experience, particularly while I was an ERP Data Migration Lead, I learned that
data is the language that connects Engineering, Planning, and Finance. Digital
tools require that these departments operate from a single source of truth.
- Joint Training: Cross-functional training sessions should
be a strategic imperative. Planners must understand how inaccurate part
consumption records from the maintenance crew (an AMO task) corrupt the ERP's
inventory data (a Finance/Supply Chain function).
- Goal Alignment: Ensure that the metrics for the
maintenance team (e.g., reducing Mean Time to Repair) align with the
metrics for the finance team (e.g., reducing spare parts inventory cost).
Digital systems facilitate this by providing transparent data that shows
how one team's accurate input directly benefits the other.
5. Strategies for
Building Trust and Buy-In
Building a digital-ready MRO workforce requires a structured change management strategy that focuses
on early involvement and clear communication.
- Involve Champions Early: Identify experienced, respected
personnel, from Part-66 certifiers to veteran line technicians, to
participate in the MRO system design and user acceptance testing (UAT).
Their buy-in and validation are invaluable for overcoming peer resistance.
- Communicate the "Why": Training cannot just be "how to use
the system." It must communicate "why we are changing."
Clearly show how the new system mitigates the pain points of the old
system (e.g., less time spent writing up reports, more time fixing the aircraft).
- Monitor and Iterate: Post-implementation, set up continuous
feedback loops. The system should be modified based on field-level input
from the maintenance teams to ensure the technology serves the workflow,
not the other way around.
The digital future of aviation maintenance is an investment in technology, process, and culture. The
most successful airlines will be those that realize the person holding the
wrench, now augmented by data and integrated software, remains their most
critical asset.
View Endnotes
- Certificate of Release to Service (CRS)
The Certificate of Release to Service is a formal declaration that a task
has been properly carried out, not a statement of airworthiness. The
responsibility for airworthiness remains with the aircraft operator.
Source: SKYbrary
Aviation Safety – Certificate of Release to Service (CRS) - Airplane Health Management (AHM)
Boeing’s AHM system supports proactive maintenance by providing real-time
fault forwarding and predictive alerts, helping MCC teams transition from
reactive to strategic roles.
Source: Boeing
Global Services – Airplane Health Management (AHM)
- Digitalizing MRO Training – Aerospace
Maintenance
This white paper outlines how simulation, digital twins, and gamification
can modernize MRO training and address technician skill gaps in a
data-driven maintenance environment.
Source: TCS
– Digitalizing MRO Training – Aerospace Maintenance
- OCC of the Future Whitepaper
M2P Consulting explores how predictive data enables OCC and MCC teams to
collaborate more effectively, improving dispatch reliability and reducing
AOG risk.
Source: M2P
Consulting – OCC of the Future Whitepaper
- Why Airworthiness Data Still Breaks in
Modern MRO Systems – And How to Fix It
EXSYN highlights how technically valid but operationally incorrect data
undermines trust and cross-functional alignment in modern MRO platforms.
Source: EXSYN
– Why Airworthiness Data Still Breaks in Modern MRO Systems – And How to
Fix It
The Certificate of Release to Service is a formal declaration that a task has been properly carried out, not a statement of airworthiness. The responsibility for airworthiness remains with the aircraft operator.
Source: SKYbrary Aviation Safety – Certificate of Release to Service (CRS)
Boeing’s AHM system supports proactive maintenance by providing real-time fault forwarding and predictive alerts, helping MCC teams transition from reactive to strategic roles.
Source: Boeing Global Services – Airplane Health Management (AHM)
This white paper outlines how simulation, digital twins, and gamification can modernize MRO training and address technician skill gaps in a data-driven maintenance environment.
Source: TCS – Digitalizing MRO Training – Aerospace Maintenance
M2P Consulting explores how predictive data enables OCC and MCC teams to collaborate more effectively, improving dispatch reliability and reducing AOG risk.
Source: M2P Consulting – OCC of the Future Whitepaper
EXSYN highlights how technically valid but operationally incorrect data undermines trust and cross-functional alignment in modern MRO platforms.
Source: EXSYN – Why Airworthiness Data Still Breaks in Modern MRO Systems – And How to Fix It
Edited Date: 13-Nov-2025
Enjoyed this post? Share it with a friend!
Have feedback or a question about this post?
Send Feedback via Email