Strategic Clarity Beyond Words: The Art of Discerning Contributions
In the intricate world of digital transformation, we've discussed the crucial first steps: identifying digital gaps and, more importantly, framing problems effectively rather than jumping to solutions. We then delved into the delicate balance of allowing insights to flow naturally during a gap analysis, while still maintaining a structured approach, the "Don't Push the River" philosophy. Now, let’s explore another layer of complexity that is absolutely critical to the success of these discovery phases: distinguishing between essential and non-essential contributions.
This isn't merely about separating good ideas from bad ones.
It’s about a subtle, often difficult, skill in facilitation and consulting:
discerning which pieces of information, which perspectives, and which voices
genuinely contribute to the core objectives of the analysis, and which, despite
their presence, might divert attention, mask true issues, or simply reflect
peripheral concerns. This skill is particularly vital for a consultant, who by
design, typically does not possess the same depth of day-to-day subject matter
expertise (SME) as the internal client team. This lack of deep content
knowledge is, ironically, a strength that fosters neutrality and allows for
objective inquiry.
But how does one, from a neutral stance, unearth the
critical insights when immersed in a sea of diverse opinions, organizational
pressures, and unspoken agendas? It requires a specific kind of vigilance and a
deliberate approach to listening and observation.
 |
| Photo by Sincerely Media on Unsplash |
The Subtlety of Contribution: Beyond the Spoken Word
During workshops, interviews, and strategic discussions,
everyone contributes. They share their experiences, propose ideas, highlight
frustrations, and offer insights. However, the true value isn't always in the
volume or even the explicit content of what's said. It lies in discerning the
signal from the noise, identifying the genuine problem drivers versus symptoms,
or filtering politically motivated statements from objective truths.
A consultant's role here is not to be the ultimate content
expert. That is the client's strength. Instead, the consultant must be the
expert in process, in facilitation, and in uncovering unbiased
reality. This means employing heightened awareness, not just to what
is being said, but to how it's being said, who is saying it, and what
isn't being said.
To achieve this, a consultant must constantly practice three
critical disciplines:
- Align
to Objectives
- Read
the Group Dynamics
- Uncover
Organizational Pressures & Influences
Let's unpack these further.
1. Align to Objectives
This is the foundational filter. Every gap analysis, every
strategic discussion, has a defined purpose: to identify pain points, to
understand current processes, to define future states, or to uncover root
causes for digital transformation. As a facilitator, your primary
responsibility is to be the guardian of these objectives.
Why it's essential: Discussions can easily spiral
into tangents, personal grievances, or solution-advocacy without sufficient
problem definition. While allowing some "river flow" is good (as
discussed in our previous post), a completely unguided discussion will waste
time and resources.
How a consultant applies it:
- Gentle
Redirection: When a conversation drifts, the consultant subtly steers
it back: "That's an interesting point about X, but how does that
specifically relate to our goal of understanding the current challenges in
flight scheduling data accuracy?"
- Explicit
Linkage: Frame questions and summarize points by explicitly tying them
back to the project's scope: "So, if I understand correctly, this
issue directly impacts our objective of reducing manual reconciliation
efforts, correct?"
- Reiteration
of Scope: At the start of sessions, and periodically as needed, a
brief reminder of "what we're here to achieve today" helps focus
everyone's input.
By doing this, the consultant helps filter out contributions
that, while potentially valid in another context, are not pertinent to the
current, defined goals. It ensures that every minute of valuable stakeholder
time is channelled effectively towards the strategic blueprint.
2. Read the Group Dynamics
The meeting room is a micro-ecosystem of the larger
organization. What's spoken is only part of the story. The unspoken, the
reactions, and the subtle power plays often hold the keys to truly essential
insights. A consultant acts like a keen anthropologist, observing the cultural
intricacies of the client.
Why it's essential:
- Uncovering
Hidden Conflicts: A seemingly innocuous comment might elicit a tense
silence, a frown, or a sudden change in posture from another participant.
This can signal underlying departmental rivalries, personal conflicts, or
deeply entrenched resistance to change.
- Identifying
True Influencers: Who do people look to when an important point is
made? Whose opinion seems to carry more weight, even if they speak less?
Identifying these informal leaders or key decision-makers is crucial, as
their buy-in and genuine input will be essential for any proposed
transformation.
- Recognizing
Unspoken Issues: Sometimes, the most important information is what isn't
said. A question about a known problem area might be met with
uncomfortable silence, quick topic changes, or vague answers. These are
often clues to deeper, more sensitive issues that people are hesitant to
articulate directly.
How a consultant applies it:
- Non-Verbal
Cues: Pay attention to eye contact (who avoids it, who seeks it), body
language (crossed arms, leaning forward, fidgeting), facial expressions,
and shifts in energy in the room.
- Verbal
Cues Beyond Content: Listen for tone of voice (frustration,
resignation, enthusiasm), hesitation, sarcasm, or sudden shifts in
vocabulary.
- Interruption
Patterns: Who interrupts whom? Who is consistently cut off, and who is
allowed to dominate? This reveals hierarchy and respect dynamics.
- Post-Meeting
Debrief: Sometimes, critical insights only emerge in one-on-one
follow-ups where individuals feel safer to share unfiltered observations
about group dynamics.
This active observation helps the consultant read between
the lines, separating genuinely shared information from responses coloured by
group dynamics or hidden agendas. This is, of course, easier said than done.
From a client-side perspective, I have seen how consultants often face
difficulties in this area, particularly when the organizational culture is more
top-down and hierarchical. It is indeed more an art than a science, one that I
myself am working on honing.
3. Uncover Organizational Pressures & Influences
Every individual in an organization operates within a web of
pressures: departmental KPIs, political alliances, fear of job changes due to
automation, past failures of similar projects, or loyalty to existing systems.
These pressures inevitably shape their contributions.
Why it's essential:
- Identifying
Biased Input: Someone might advocate for a specific solution not
because it's the best for the organization, but because it benefits their
department, aligns with a personal agenda, or avoids a perceived threat to
their team.
- Uncovering
Systemic Issues: Apparent individual resistance might actually be a
symptom of a systemic organizational pressure—e.g., a bonus structure that
disincentivizes inter-departmental collaboration, or a history of failed
IT projects that breeds cynicism.
- Distinguishing
Symptoms from Root Causes: A contributor might passionately describe a
symptom (e.g., "our reports are always late!"). By understanding
their organizational pressures, a consultant can probe deeper ("Is
there a fear of being blamed for delays? What happens if a report is
late?") to uncover the root cause, which might be a flawed process or
lack of data sharing, rather than just individual inefficiency.
How a consultant applies it:
- "Why,
Why, Why?": Continuously asking "why" (tactfully) to
get beyond surface-level statements and uncover underlying motivations or
constraints.
- Looking
for Defensiveness: If a contributor becomes defensive when a certain
process or data point is questioned, it's a clue that there might be a
sensitive area or an unstated pressure point.
- Cross-Referencing:
Comparing inputs from different departments on the same process.
Discrepancies often highlight areas where organizational pressures are
distorting the perceived reality.
- Observing
Advocacy: When someone pushes hard for a particular tool or approach,
the consultant asks: "What problem would that solve for your team
specifically?" This helps gauge if the contribution is essential for
the whole or only for a part.
By understanding these pressures, the consultant can
interpret contributions more accurately, identifying inputs that genuinely
serve the overall transformation versus those influenced by internal forces.
The Art of Distillation: Guiding Towards True Insight
Distinguishing between essential and non-essential
contributions is a subtle art that defines effective consulting. It is not
about dismissing anyone's voice but about carefully distilling the collective
input into actionable, unbiased insights. This disciplined discernment ensures
that the digital transformation roadmap is built on a foundation of genuine
problems and objective realities, rather than assumptions, biases, or
superficial observations.
This expert facilitation is what turns complex, often
chaotic, group discussions into a precise and invaluable strategic blueprint
for your airline's digital future. It's how we ensure that the
"river" of information, allowed to flow naturally, is also wisely
navigated to its true and most beneficial destination.
Edited: 14-Jul-2025
Enjoyed this post? Share it with a friend!
Have feedback or a question about this post?
Send Feedback via Email